Virtual Medical Coaching in Academic Journals

Virtual reality training for radiation safety in cardiac catheterization laboratories - an integrated study

Introduction The advent of fluoroscopically guided cardiology procedures has greatly improved patient outcomes but has also increased occupational radiation exposure for healthcare professionals. This has led to adverse health effects, including radiation-induced cataracts, alopecia, and cancer, emphasizing the need for effective radiation safety training.

Limitations of Traditional Training Methods Traditional radiation safety training methods often rely on passive learning, which fails to adequately simulate the dynamic environment of the catheterization laboratory. This gap highlights the potential for alternative training methods that can provide a more realistic learning experience.

The Promise of Virtual Reality (VR) in Radiation Safety Training Virtual Reality (VR) offers a promising solution by creating immersive, interactive experiences that mimic real-world scenarios without exposing healthcare professionals to radiation risks. This study evaluates the effectiveness of VR-based training compared to traditional approaches.

Study Design We conducted a prospective cohort study involving 48 healthcare professionals working in a catheterization lab. Each participant completed a 1-hour self-directed VR training session using Virtual Medical Coaching's RadSafe VR software, which simulates realistic clinical scenarios.

Data Collection and Assessment Methods To measure outcomes, we recorded pre- and post-intervention radiation dose levels using personal dosimeters at the eye, chest, and pelvis. Additionally, knowledge and skills were assessed through tests, with feedback collected via surveys and interviews.

Results The statistical analysis showed a significant reduction in radiation exposure across all professional groups following VR training:

• Cardiologists: Eye dose decreased by 21.88% (2.88 mSv to 2.25 mSv), chest dose by 21.65% (4.11 mSv to 3.22 mSv), and pelvis dose by 21.84% (2.06 mSv to 1.61 mSv).
• Perioperative Nurses: Eye doses fell by 14.74% (1.56 mSv to 1.33 mSv), chest doses by 26.92% (2.6 mSv to 1.9 mSv), and pelvis doses by 26.92% (1.3 mSv to 0.95 mSv).
• Radiographers: Eye doses were reduced by 18.95% (0.95 mSv to 0.77 mSv), chest doses by 42.11% (1.9 mSv to 1.1 mSv), and pelvis doses by 27.63% (0.76 mSv to 0.55 mSv).

Participant Feedback Participants reported greater engagement and an improved understanding of radiation safety. They also expressed a preference for VR-based training over traditional methods.

Cost Analysis A cost analysis revealed the economic benefits of VR training, demonstrating significant savings in staff time and rental costs compared to traditional approaches.

Conclusion Our findings suggest that VR is an effective and cost-efficient tool for radiation safety training in healthcare, offering significant advantages over traditional training methods.