Some learners laugh, joke, or disengage during clinical simulations—not from disrespect, but from anxiety, discomfort, or uncertainty. Understanding and addressing these behaviors helps educators maintain psychological safety and foster professional growth. With high-fidelity VR simulation, the realism itself often reduces “silliness” and promotes genuine engagement.
Understanding the Psychology Behind Disruptive Laughter
Behaviors that appear unserious are often defensive. Learners facing uncertainty, performance anxiety, or peer observation may use humor to protect themselves from embarrassment. Simulation is a high-stakes, public learning environment, and laughter can be a way to manage discomfort rather than defy authority (Fraser et al., 2012).
Cultural and group dynamics also contribute. In some cultures, open anxiety is discouraged, and humor becomes a socially acceptable outlet. When one learner breaks the tension through laughter, others often follow to maintain social alignment. Left unchecked, this can shift the atmosphere from professional to performative.
Early and Respectful Intervention
Simulation educators must respond promptly, but with empathy. A brief private discussion is more effective than a public reprimand, which can erode trust and psychological safety (Rudolph et al., 2014).
Ask questions that show curiosity rather than judgment:
“I noticed you seemed uncomfortable during the case. Can you tell me what’s happening?”
Reconnecting the learner to the relevance of the simulation—by emphasizing that the scenario reflects real patient care—helps reframe behavior. Setting expectations early also matters. Clear professional standards signal that simulation is not an act but a rehearsal for clinical responsibility.
Addressing Anxiety and Discomfort
Defensive humor usually signals anxiety, not apathy. Educators should normalize uncertainty and explain that simulation exists for safe learning through error. Sharing personal stories of professional mistakes helps learners see imperfection as part of growth (Sawyer et al., 2016).
Breaking scenarios into smaller, structured steps lowers cognitive load (Fraser et al., 2015). Psychological preparation during pre-briefing, acknowledging that simulation can feel artificial, helps learners engage authentically. Discussing how to communicate with manikins or standardized patients can prevent laughter that masks discomfort.
Redirecting Energy Toward Learning
High-energy learners are not necessarily disengaged; they just need structure. Assigning defined roles, such as team leader or coordinator, channels enthusiasm into productive responsibility. During debriefs, these learners can summarize findings or lead reflection, reinforcing focus and accountability.
The Role of Environment
The physical and social environment sets the tone. Simulation spaces designed to mirror real clinical settings promote authentic engagement (Hamstra et al., 2014). Classroom-like spaces or overly casual faculty behavior can signal that simulation is “pretend.”
Instructor demeanor is pivotal. When faculty model professionalism—speaking seriously about patient care, maintaining structure, and demonstrating respect for manikins or virtual patients, learners quickly mirror that standard.
VR Simulation: Realism That Demands Professionalism
Virtual reality (VR) simulation introduces new possibilities for engagement. Its immersive realism reduces the artificiality that often triggers nervous laughter. High-fidelity VR environments replicate not only procedures but also the social and emotional context of care, enhancing presence and accountability (Slater, 2018).
Unlike traditional manikin-based setups that rely on imagination, VR presents dynamic patient interactions, real-time feedback, and visible consequences of actions. This immediacy minimizes the cognitive dissonance that drives humor as a defense mechanism.
Research shows that VR simulation increases engagement and reduces anxiety through immersion, repetition, and self-paced learning (Butt et al., 2018; Kyaw et al., 2019). It encourages learners to behave as professionals because the simulated world feels real.
At Virtual Medical Coaching, for example, immersive radiography and radiation safety simulations allow learners to communicate with responsive virtual patients, adjust positioning, and evaluate dose and image quality. These environments reward concentration and professionalism. The realistic patient reactions and technical feedback close the psychological gap between training and clinical practice. As a result, learners treat simulations with focus rather than humor.
Maintaining Psychological Safety in Virtual Environments
Even in VR, psychological safety must be intentional. Learners can still feel self-conscious or overwhelmed. Facilitators should continue to emphasize respect, reflection, and emotional safety.
Private performance review features in VR, such as automated feedback and replay, allow learners to analyze mistakes without embarrassment. This reduces the defensive humor that often arises in group settings. When learners feel supported and accountable, engagement deepens.
Practical Recommendations
| Objective |
Strategy |
| Prevent laughter and distraction |
Clarify professional expectations in the pre-brief |
| Support anxious learners |
Normalize uncertainty; discuss emotional reactions |
| Maintain psychological safety |
Intervene privately, not publicly |
| Redirect energy |
Assign leadership or coordination roles |
| Promote realism |
Use authentic environments or immersive VR |
| Reinforce relevance |
Link each simulation to future patient care |
| Encourage reflection |
Use structured, empathetic debriefing |
Transforming Disruption Into Professional Growth
The unserious learner rarely lacks motivation—they lack comfort and confidence. By addressing the psychological roots of humor and distraction, educators can transform resistance into engagement.
Realism, structure, and empathy are key. When learners experience the connection between simulation and real patient outcomes, they are better equipped to meet professional expectations. High-fidelity VR simulations, such as those developed by Virtual Medical Coaching, strengthen this connection through immersion and authentic feedback.
Simulation done well is not a performance; it is preparation. As learners step into more realistic environments, they discover that seriousness is not enforced; it emerges naturally from purpose and presence.
References
-
Fraser K, et al. The emotional and cognitive impact of simulation-based education. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2012;17(1):61–77.
-
Rudolph JW, Raemer DB, Simon R. Establishing a safe container for learning in simulation. Simul Healthc. 2014;9(6):339–349.
-
Ahmed M, Sevdalis N, Vincent C. Managing disruptive behavior in simulation training. Clin Teach. 2013;10(1):50–54.
-
Fraser K, et al. Cognitive load and simulation design. Med Educ. 2015;49(2):107–115.
-
Sawyer T, Eppich W, Brett-Fleegler M, Grant V, Cheng A. More than one way to debrief: a critical review. Simul Healthc. 2016;11(3):209–217.
-
Hamstra SJ, Brydges R, Hatala R, Zendejas B, Cook DA. Reconsidering fidelity in simulation-based training. Simul Healthc. 2014;9(6):356–363.
-
Butt AL, Kardong-Edgren S, Ellertson A. Using game-based virtual reality with nursing students. Cureus. 2018;10(2):e2258.
-
Kyaw BM, et al. Virtual reality for health professions education: systematic review and meta-analysis. npj Digit Med. 2019;2:29.
-
Slater M. Immersion and the illusion of presence in virtual reality. Front Robot AI. 2018;5:29.
-
Dieckmann P. The art and science of debriefing in simulation. Simul Gaming. 2007;38(1):6–28.